Editor’s note: This is the sixth in a series of commentaries presented by the undersigned superintendents and board presidents concerning funding for public schools.
Today, a number of legislators support specific educational reforms our future will view as unfortunate. The term “school choice” is now tossed around as the cure-all to a public school system they perceive as failing.
School choice is a packaging brand name applied to stale terms like vouchers, taxpayer credits, block grants, charter schools and for-profit academies.
These alternatives are designed to redirect taxpayer dollars from our current public schools toward unproven “school choice” options. Among the array of choices, a new term has surfaced known as Home Rule District charter schools.
Proponents for Home Rule Districts (HRDs) claim that, along with individuals, communities as a whole deserve school choice. This option allows the voters of a community the ability to convert their local traditional public school district to a Home Rule District charter school.
For the record, converting to an HRD has been available since 1995 when the Texas Education Code was revised. HRDs are exempt from some but not as many of the state regulations and mandates as open-enrollment charter schools.
Proponents stretch the benefits Home Rule Districts would enjoy. With fewer perceived state restrictions, proponents believe HRDs would be more cost-efficient and allow communities to implement additional educational reforms.
Their vision of independence includes community public schools removed from the long arm of government and, if desired, an entire new form of local governance implemented at will – paradise. This utopia would be funded by a plentiful “block grant.” The translation to the words block grant is “giant voucher.”
If it’s too good to be true – you know the rest of the line. To date, there has not been a single public school district to convert via charter to a Home Rule District. In 1995, the triggers involving the conversion to an HRD were purposely set at a height that requires serious involvement by a local school district community. The reason is simple; drastic decisions require community participation at the highest level.